Comments on: Fampridine SR’s PDUFA date delayed (NASDAQ:ACOR)

By: Caroline

Caroline — Sun, 24 Jan 2010 14:24:53 +0000

Honestly, this is not the kind of articles I expect from Favstocks which I hold in high esteem.

By: carol

carol — Fri, 22 Jan 2010 00:40:01 +0000

FYI..my spouse died during Phase III trials of this drug two years ago. Many side effects.

By: Mike

Mike — Thu, 21 Jan 2010 08:25:44 +0000

I assume the PDUFA date is still 1/22 since no other media is picking this up. If so, it is completely irresponsible to post this article now – plus you made a typo further confusing the issue. The delay was several months ago. There are so many patients waiting for this drug to be approved in addition to the investment community. Misleading them to think the FDUFA has been delayed again is a poor effort to gain a reader.

By: Will

Will — Thu, 21 Jan 2010 04:34:45 +0000

This article was poorly written and titled. ‘Typos” are not an acceptable excuse when communicating critical dates that can effect stock price. Additionally, publishing this article on a day when the market was down lends one to think that the intent was to further drive down the stock price of Acorda. This perception can have an overarching impact on the credibility of the website from which the article originated. I would suggest FavStocks publish a correction and seek ways to prevent this from happening in the future – perhaps implementing some sort of QA process. There has been no news today indicating a delay in the PDUFA date for Fampridine-SR currently set for January 22, 2010 – this Friday.

By: FavStocks

FavStocks — Wed, 20 Jan 2010 22:51:23 +0000

There was a typo in the article from the Author. Rest assured the typo in the date has been corrected. Please also note the correct date was on our Free FDA Calendar. Thanks for understanding.

By: J scholar

J scholar — Wed, 20 Jan 2010 21:04:54 +0000

Difficult to follow: so what is the new PDUFA date October 22, 2010 or October 22, 2010?

By: John

John — Wed, 20 Jan 2010 20:24:46 +0000

Why is the headline “Fampridine SRâ€™s PDUFA date delayed”?

This is misleading, since we are waiting on a decision on or before Jan 22, 2010 but you are writing about the decision from 2 months ago, on Oct 14, 2009.

Source: http://nationalmssociety.org/news/news-detail/index.aspx?nid=2239

By: John

John — Wed, 20 Jan 2010 20:05:54 +0000

Article states: “The new PDUFA date is October 22, 2009.”

Is this a typo? Isn’t the new date January 22, 2010?

By: Will

Will — Wed, 20 Jan 2010 19:51:10 +0000

John, your article is a bit confusing. Are you sure you have your dates correct in the beginning of the article. Your title is a bit misleading. The PDUFA date for fampridine SR is this week. Are you saying that the PDUFA date scheduled for this week has been delayed? If you are not saying that, I am not sure I understand why you are recapping really old news and if this article fits the subtitle of your site – this fits the latter – ‘$h!t’