The Katrina chronicles: Formaldehyde-laced trailers set to claim another set of victims

By Environmental Defense on 03/14/2010 – 9:19 pm PST -- Green

Richard Denison, Ph.D., is a Senior Scientist.

The Washington Post ran a front-page article Saturday, written by Spencer Hsu, which reported the auction sale by FEMA of most of the 120,000 notorious formaldehyde-tainted trailers it had purchased five years ago to house the victims of Hurricane Katrina.

The article cites FEMA as saying that “wholesale buyers from the auction must sign contracts attesting that trailers will not be used, sold or advertised as housing, and that trailers will carry a sticker saying, ‘Not to be used for housing’.”

Think that’s likely to be enough? 

Think again. Consider this excerpt from a consumer alert issued by the Attorney General of Arkansas, Dustin McDaniel: “Proceed with caution, extreme caution, if you are tempted to respond to what appears to be an attractive offer for a travel trailer or manufactured home.” He and others pointed to the high likelihood that the trailers will now enter a market where they may be sold and resold repeatedly and the warning label removed or ignored.

Hsu cites one woman who several years ago purchased a trailer for her son – days before all the publicity broke about dangerous levels of formaldehyde. Now she’s worried about him keeping the trailer, but also has qualms about selling it to someone else. “This is like history repeating itself," she said. "People are all going to buy them, move into them and then start getting sick."

Some buyers appear to have fewer qualms: The highest bidder for the FEMA trailers says he already has buyers – retailers who intend to resell the trailers – for the 15,000 units he bought at auction, adding that formaldehyde is a “non-topic” that his buyers don’t even ask about.

This story vividly illustrates just how enduring the lifecycles of dangerous chemicals can be when our policies let chemicals get so deeply embedded into commerce without requiring they be shown to be safe.

It’s not an isolated incident. In another recent front page Washington Post article, Lyndsay Layton documented the difficulties faced by the food industry in trying to replace a chemical used to make the lining used inside virtually every food can sold in America. That chemical is bisphenol A (BPA) – a hormone-like compound which is found in the bodies of 93% of the American public, and is now suspected of interfering with human reproduction and early development. Some 6 billion pounds of BPA are produced annually.

But back to formaldehyde, an estimated 46 billion pounds of which are made annually.

TSCA shares the blame

A year ago, in the House of Representatives’ first oversight hearing on the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) in decades, I testified about how the structural flaws in this 34-year-old law played a key role in allowing those FEMA trailers to be built and to deliver a second knock-out blow to Katrina victims.

The FEMA trailers were made using plywood imported from China. That plywood is made using adhesives that release high levels of formaldehyde, a known human carcinogen. China makes a low-formaldehyde product for export to Europe and Japan, and even for domestic use in China, because in those markets there are regulatory limits in place. But they have a ready market here in the U.S. for the cheaper, more dangerous plywood because we have no such restrictions. That plywood ended up in the FEMA trailers – and continues to be solid into countless other markets across the country.

In 2008, the U

Pages: 1 2

  • rich

    The issue of formaldehyde is much larger than the infamous FEMA trailers. Look at the conclusion in a report published by the California Air Resources Board on December 15, 2009.

    “Nearly all homes (98%) had formaldehyde concentrations that exceeded guidelines for cancer and chronic irritation…”

    At the same time we claim we don’t understand why childhood cancer and asthma are increasing so rapidly that it has to be an environmental exposure issue.

    The typical infamous FEMA trailer had 77 ppb of formaldehyde in room air. My home had 93 ppb of formaldehdye. Turned out the source was the underlayment under the carpet installed during the original construction of the home back in 1963.

    Take a look at the cover article of the February 2010 Synergist, a peer review magazine. It discusses the indoor air quality of homes and documents that formaldehyde concentrations in energy efficient homes is significantly higher. Isn’t the entire focus for the past decade been on energy efficiency? How often have you heard indoor air quality being discussed?

    Not long ago the typical conventional home had only 14 ppb. For energy efficent conventionally built homes build in 2009 you can multiple that concentration by about ten.

    It would be nice if the US had the simplistic requirement that a chemical had to be proven to be safe prior to use. Currently, the US allows chemicals to be used until they are proven unsafe.

    Consumers need to educate and protect themselves as big brother is NOT doing it. Formaldehyde testing is simple and inexpensive at $39. That might be the lowest health insurance premium you ever pay.

blog comments powered by Disqus